Collins v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
916 F.3d 1302 · 2019
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) its members would otherwise have standing to sue in their own right; (b) the interests it seeks to protect are germane to the organization's purpose; and (c) neither the claim asserted nor the relief requested requires the participation of individual members in the lawsuit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the party asserting the right has a close relationship with the person who possesses the right [and] there is a hindrance to the possessor's ability to protect his own interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] party generally must assert his own legal rights and interests, and cannot rest his claim to relief on the legal rights or interests of third parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.