Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 916 NW2D 351 - LaPenotiere v. State

LaPenotiere v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Moore · Butala v. State · State v. Nelson · State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne Riggs · State v. Thonesavanh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to determine whether the evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict, were sufficient to allow the jury to reach its verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “State v. Thonesavanh , 904 N.W.2d 432 , 440 (Minn. 2017). The rule”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.