Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 916 NW2D 550 - State v. Scovel

State v. Scovel’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on County of Washington v. Gunther · Cabell v. Markham · State v. Olson · State v. Shattuck · State v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] person convicted under the provisions of subdivision 2, clause (1) ... is guilty of a gross misdemeanor if: (1) the amount of the controlled substance possessed, other than heroin, is less than 0.25 grams or one dosage unit or less if the controlled substance was possessed in dosage units”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he classification of a prior offense as a petty misdemeanor, misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or felony is determined by current Minnesota offense definitions (see Minn. Stat. § 609.02 , subds. 2-4a ) and sentencing policies.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If the Guidelines language is plain and unambiguous, it is presumed to manifest the intent of the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.