Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 916 P2D 366 - State v. Heiskell

State v. Heiskell’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably DeYoung v. Providence Medical Center (1998), State v. Wilkinson (2000)

26 state decisions

140199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 109 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Schaaf · 125 Wash. 2d 277 - Westerman v. Cary · Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc. · 123 Wash. 2d 488 - State v. Ward · 107 Wash. 2d 503 - Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and Paroles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Const. art. I, § 12 `require that "`persons similarly situated with respect to the legitimate purpose of the law receive like treatment.'"' State v. Schaaf, 109 Wash.2d 1, 17 , 743 P.2d 240 (1987) (quoting State v. Phelan, 100 Wash.2d 508, 512 , 671 P.2d 1212 (1983) (quoting Harmon v. McNutt, 91 Wash.2d 126, 130 , 587 P.2d 537 (1978))). One of three tests may be used to determine whether this clause has been violated. First, the strict scrutiny test applies when a classification affects a suspect class or a fundamental right. Schaaf, at 17, 743 P.2d 240 .... Second, the intermediate scrutiny test may apply `in limited circumstances': the Supreme Court has applied this test for gender-based classifications; this court has applied intermediate scrutiny to classifications affecting `both an important right (the right to liberty) and a semi-suspect class not accountable for its status (the poor).' Schaaf, at 18, 743 P.2d 240 .... Third, under the rational relationship test, `a law is subjected to minimal scrutiny and will be upheld "`unless it rests on grounds wholly irrelevant to the achievement of a legitimate state objective.'"' Schaaf, at 17, 743 P.2d 240 (quoting Phelan, at 512, 671 P.2d 1212 (quoting Nielsen v. Washington State Bar Ass'n, 90 Wash.2d 818, 820 , 585 P.2d 1191 (1978)))."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[T]his state's policy is to assist local law enforcement agencies' efforts to protect their communities by regulating sex offenders by requiring sex offenders to register with local law enforcement. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`[standard] is the most relaxed and tolerant form of judicial scrutiny under the equal protection clause.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.