State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc. (1998), McKinney v. State (1998)
2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · United States v. White · Lopez v. United States · United States v. Caceres · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'... secret ... intended only for the persons involved (a conversation) ... holding a confidential relationship to something ... a secret message: a private communication ... secretly: not open or in public.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) ... it shall be unlawful for any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or the state of Washington, its agencies, and political subdivisions to intercept, or record any: (a) Private communication transmitted by telephone, telegraph, radio, or other device between two or more individuals between points within or without the state by any device electronic or otherwise designed to record and/or transmit said communication regardless how such device is powered or actuated without first obtaining the consent of all the participants in the communication. (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`intent or reasonable expectations of the participants [of a conversation] as manifested by the facts and circumstances of each case' control as to whether a conversation is private.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.