Eason v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 568 So. 2d 1173 - Roundtree v. State · 530 So. 2d 694 - Davis v. State · Williams v. State · 511 So. 2d 144 - Suan v. State · 733 So. 2d 793 - Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A trial judge enjoys a great deal of discretion as to the relevancy and admissibility of evidence." Farmer v. State, 770 So.2d 953, 958 (¶ 15) (Miss.2000). "The scope of cross-examination, though ordinarily broad, is within the sound discretion of the trial court and the trial court possesses inherent power to limit cross-examination to relevant matters." Smith v. State, 733 So.2d 793 (¶ 37) (Miss.1999). "Unless the judge abuses this discretion so as to be prejudicial to the accused, the Court will not reverse this ruling." Farmer v. State, 770 So.2d 953, 958 (¶ 15) (Miss.2000).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rankin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.