Solomon v. Dickison’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 743 So. 2d 627 - Management Computer v. Perry Const. · 575 So. 2d 630 - State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. KAW · 464 So. 2d 538 - Walter v. Walter · 730 So. 2d 289 - Koulisis v. Rivers · Nissan Motor Corp. v. Orozco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter: (a) represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent; or (b) use information relating to the representation to the disadvantage of the former client except as rule 4-1.6 would permit with respect to a client or when the information has become generally known.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“irrefutable presumption that confidences were disclosed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.