Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 916 SW2D 309 - Scott v. State

Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Blankenship

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This case appears to be a hybrid between a bench trial and a plea hearing. [Defendant] had a bench trial; he submitted his case to the trial court solely on police reports and depositions. However, both parties also used the terms “plea negotiations” throughout the proceedings .... ⅝ ‡ ⅜ ⅜ ⅝ ⅜ [Defendant] knowingly and voluntarily submitted his case to the trial court on stipulated facts. Moreover, the trial court adequately informed [defendant] of his Sixth Amendment rights, although some of the questions were not necessary because there was a trial and not a guilty plea. * ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ * * The record confirms [defendant] was informed of his Sixth Amendment rights. He knowingly waived these rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.