¶1In this jury-tried case, defendant was charged with first degree murder
¶2No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
¶3The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
¶4 The trial court’s written judgment indicates defendant was found guilty of first degree murder. *341This is inconsistent with the jury’s verdict and the court’s oral pronouncement of second degree murder. Pursuant to Rule 30.23, we correct the trial court’s judgment to read second degree murder.