Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 916 S.W.2d 88 - Posey v. State

Posey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1998
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 177th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Almanza v. State · Geesa v. State · Stanley v. Kemp · Benson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f no proper objection was made at trial and the accused must claim that the error was “fundamental,” he will obtain a reversal only if the error is so egregious and created such harm that he “has not had a fair and impartial trial” — in short “egregious harm.” ... the actual degree of harm must be assayed in light of the entire jury charge, the state of the evidence, including the contested issues and weight of probative evidence, the argument of counsel and any other relevant information revealed by the record of the trial as a whole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.