Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 917 F.2d 1017 - Pelfresne v. Village of Williams Bay

Pelfresne v. Village of Williams Bay’s Empirical Analysis

917 F.2d 1017 · 1990

Citation profile

143
cited by 143 later decisions
2
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

76 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 143 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Bobby J. Anderson v. Alfred Hardman (2001), Phillips v. Calhoun (1992)

76 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

9701990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2283 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers · Mitchum v. Foster · Kungys v. United States · Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Worthington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 143 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A litigant who fails to press a point by supporting it with pertinent authority, or by showing why it is sound despite a lack of supporting authority or in the face of contrary authority, forfeits the point.”
    25 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.