United States v. Cammisano’s Empirical Analysis
917 F.2d 1057 · 1990
Citation profile
59 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably United States v. Wise (1992), United States v. Simmons (1992)
59 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Porzig v. Nolden · Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc. · United States v. Fatico · United States v. Kim · United States v. Ferra
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rules of evidence do not apply at sentencing, but the Confrontation Clause ... does apply.... [H]earsay statements admitted against a defendant do violate the Confrontation Clause unless a court finds that the declarant is unavailable and that there are indicia of reliability supporting the truthfulness of the hearsay statements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.