Lee v. Yeutter’s Empirical Analysis
917 F.2d 1104 · 1990
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2016
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 7 U.S.C. § 1985 · 7 U.S.C. § 1991 · 7 U.S.C. § 2001
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Southeastern Community College v. Davis · National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co. · Chemical Manufacturers Association v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · Young v. Community Nutrition Institute
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“7 U.S.C. Sec. 2001 (a) (1988). The primary loan programs allow the Secretary to consolidate, reamortize, reschedule, defer or decrease the amount of loans or reduce the interest rate on loans. See id. Sec. 1991(b)(3) (1988). The Secretary considers a detailed list of factors when determining which, if any, of these programs should be made available to any particular farmer. Id. Sec. 2001(b)-(c) (1988); 7 C.F.R. Secs. 1951.902, 1951.909 (1990). The second category of programs, referred to as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lee v. Yeutter“to the Secretary and thus could not be a borrower within the meaning of the Act. 53 Fed.Reg. 35,652 (1988). 4 The plaintiffs are farmers who filed Chapter 7 bankruptcies and received discharges of their debts--including their FmHA loans--yet continue to retain the property that secured their debt to the Secretary. The plaintiffs (hereinafter”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lee v. Yeutter“any farm borrower who has outstanding obligations to the Secretary under any farmer program loan, without regard to whether the loan has been accelerated, but does not include any farm borrower all of whose loans and accounts have been foreclosed on or liquidated, voluntarily or otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lee v. Yeutter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.