United States v. Moralez’s Empirical Analysis
917 F.2d 18 · 1990
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
August 2006
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · United States v. Scafe · United States v. Halbert · United States v. Moralez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he informant had only limited information, was not present during the commission of the offense, and could not provide any evidence which is not cumulative or which is exculpatory. To the contrary, the limited information possessed by the informant is strictly inculpatory, and it will not provide material to support his theory of the case or to aid his impeachment of his codefendants as he has asserted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.