Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 917 F.2d 189 - Brown v. Sullivan

Brown v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

917 F.2d 189 · 1990

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2011

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

140199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Blanchard v. Bergeron · Venegas v. Mitchell · Coup v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this title who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as a part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the court must, where a contingent fee agreement is involved, articulate the weight of contingency”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “contingency-fee factor is simply that, a factor,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.