United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
917 F.2d 215 · 1990
Citation profile
107 federal appellate · 8 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 215 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2023 · most notably Byrd v. Collins (2000), Moore v. United States (1991)
107 federal appellate · 8 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2114
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Griffin v. California · United States v. Matlock · Massiah v. United States · Brewer v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 215 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing the trial court's decision for an abuse of discretion, the appellate court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to its proponent, giving 'the evidence its maximum reasonable probative force and its minimum reasonable prejudicial value.'”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“(1) Were the comments “manifestly intended” to reflect the accused’s silence or of such a character that the jury would “naturally and necessarily” take them as such; (2) Were the remarks isolated or extensive; (3) Was the evidence of guilt otherwise overwhelming; [and] (4) What curative instructions were given, and when.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A defendant may move for a mistrial where there is a legitimate claim of seriously prejudicial error.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.