Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

917 F.2d 22

Docket No. 90-6752.

Brown v. Dixon

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Sept. 10, 1990. Decided Oct. 26, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Dec. 11, 1990.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-12-11

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Edward Profitt v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-12-11

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-88-135-CRT)

Nelson Lee Brown, appellant pro se.

David McLean Parker, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Nelson Lee Brown appeals the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record, the magistrate's report and recommendation, and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court, and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*

Brown's motions for appointment of counsel and for a transcript are denied

/917/f2d/22 · .json · Public domain