Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 917 F.2d 272 - Wilcox v. Sullivan

Wilcox v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

917 F.2d 272 · 1990

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2017

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

100199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Kirk v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Allen v. Califano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]laimant should not be penalized because he had the courage and determination to continue working despite his disabling condition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The principles enunciated in Parish were not applied to the facts of this case. The Secretary erroneously relied on Wilcox’s activities during the periods of remission as evidence of his substantial gainful employment. The record, when viewed in light of the well-reasoned principles established in Parish , lead us to conclude that Wilcox, who suffered from a progressively debilitating disease, was disabled by multiple sclerosis effective February 24,1986.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.