Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 917 F.2d 297 - Continental Casualty Company v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Ppg Industries, Inc.

Continental Casualty Company v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Ppg Industries, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

917 F.2d 297 · 1990

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
6
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Harbor Insurance v. Continental Bank Corp. (1990), Pipefitters Welfare Educational Fund v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company (1993)

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

1801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc. · Two Guys v. S.F.R. Realty Associates · Sturla, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance · 544 F. Supp. 669 - American Motorists Insurance v. Trane Co. · North Gate Corp. v. National Food Stores, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n exclusion from insurance coverage cannot create coverage.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “all expense for salaried employees and retained counsel of and all office expenses of the insured.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in accordance with the applicable insuring agreements of the Primary Insurance,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.