Estate of Korf v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
917 F.2d 480 · 1990
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2011
11 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc. · Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. · Durflinger v. Artiles · Neu v. Grant · Frick v. Abell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t would appear . . . that victims of tortious conduct are clearly entitled to prejudgment interest under the statute.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“money was wrongfully withheld from the Korfs on the date they were fraudulently induced to undertake the obligation for the defective Harvestore silo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that grain stored in Harvestore silos was subject to excessive spoilage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.