Lopez v. Rd Garriga’s Empirical Analysis
917 F.2d 63 · 1990
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 10 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc. (1996), El Dia, Inc. v. Hernandez Colon (1992)
16 federal appellate · 10 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1357 (§ 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Warth v. Seldin · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An injunction-seeker must show either that some past unlawful conduct has continuing impact into the future ... or else he must show a likelihood of future unlawful conduct on the defendant’s part____ To gain a permanent injunction in the former ease, the plaintiff must actually succeed on the merits of his claim by proving that the past conduct violated his rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a court does not retain authority to grant an injunction, even though the plaintiff originally had standing to ask for one, if during the course of the proceeding the plaintiff loses his toehold on the standing ladder”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[r]easonableness is a concept, not a constant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.