Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 917 F.2d 918 - Ashbrook v. Block

Ashbrook v. Block’s Empirical Analysis

917 F.2d 918 · 1990

Citation profile

192
cited by 192 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 192 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably University Medical Center v. Sullivan (1992), Sullivan v. Town & Country Home Nursing Services, Inc. (1991)

26 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1650199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 106 · 11 U.S.C. § 510 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 2675 · 7 U.S.C. § 1989

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Anderson v. Creighton · Perry v. Sindermann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 192 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “); In re Shelby County Healthcare Services of Al, Inc., 80 B.R. 555, 561 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Ga.1987) (following Matter of Kenny ). We hold that section 106(a) contains no administrative exhaustion requirement. 24 The Ashbrooks, however, have failed to meet an additional requirement of section 106(a) because their counterclaim is not compulsory within the meaning of Fed.R.Civ.P. 13(a). A claim is a compulsory counterclaim under Rule 13(a)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]lthough the nonmoving party's evidence in opposition to summary judgment need not be of the sort admissible at trial, he must employ proof other than his pleadings and own affidavits to establish the existence of specific triable facts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.