Roe v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis
917 F.3d 229 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1581 · 18 U.S.C. § 1585 · 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (§ 112 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000) · 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (§ 112 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000) · 18 U.S.C. § 1594 (§ 112 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000) · 18 U.S.C. § 1595 · 18 U.S.C. § 1596 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co. · Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. · Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India · United States v. Queen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the trial evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.