Peña-Garcia v. Dir., Office of Workers' Comp. Programs’s Empirical Analysis
917 F.3d 61 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 33 U.S.C. § 907 · 33 U.S.C. § 928
Relies on Sprague v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs · Bath Iron Works v. Brown · Bath Iron Works Corp. v. United States Department of Labor · Barker v. United States Department of Labor · Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Baca
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing for substantial evidence, we assess the record as a whole, and we will affirm so long as we are satisfied that the record contains 'such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the Board adhered to the 'substantial evidence' standard when it reviewed the ALJ's factual findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.