Williams v. Strickland’s Empirical Analysis
917 F.3d 763 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Pearson v. Callahan · Tennessee v. Garner · Hope v. Pelzer · 134 S. Ct. 2012 - Plumhoff v. Rickard · Plumhoff v. Rickard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if we take the facts as the district court gives them to us, and we view those facts in the light most favorable to [Appellees],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gilliam v. Sealey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.