In re Picard’s Empirical Analysis
917 F.3d 85 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 304 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 548 · 11 U.S.C. § 550 · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78F (§ 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 35 U.S.C. § 271 · 35 U.S.C. § 284
Relies on Burford v. Sun Oil Co. · Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. · Hartford Fire Insurance Co v. California Merrett Underwriting Agency Management Limited · General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp. · Smith v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“International comity comes into play only when there is a true conflict between American law and that of a foreign jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The focus of a statute is the conduct it seeks to regulate, as well as the parties whose interests it seeks to protect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bascuñán v. Elsaca“either the statute indicates its extraterritorial reach or the case involves a domestic application of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bascuñán v. Elsaca
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.