Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 917 FSUPP2D 262 - Yoselovsky v. Associated Press

Yoselovsky v. Associated Press’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “AP”) under Title VII, the NYSHRL and NYCHRL, alleging that the AP terminated him because he requested time off to observe the weekly Jewish Sabbath and other religious holidays. Id. at 265 . AP presented evidence that Yoselovsky was terminated because his job performance had fallen below his managers’ expectations. Id. at 275-76 . The court found that Yoselovsky had “no ... supporting evidence,” for his claim that after he took time off time for religious holidays his supervisors started creating a record to rationalize his termination, and the court found that his argument was based”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “may be something suspicious in the timing between when he took off work for religious holidays and when the AP’s allegedly discriminatory actions arose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]ithout any additional evidence of some invidious desire to falsify his employment reviews ... the argument is wholly speculative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.