Markin v. Markin

David MARKIN, Appellant, v. Susan MARKIN, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 4, 2006.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-01-04

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2019

11 state decisions

Relies on 683 So. 2d 209 - Hipschman v. Cochran

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-01-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Joel M. Weissman of Weissman & Yaffa, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Jeffrey D. Fisher and Georgia T. Newman of Fisher & Bendeck, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Philip M. Burlington of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We reverse an order holding appellant in contempt for failing to pay alimony which he had been ordered to pay. We do not agree with appellant's argument that a stay had been in effect; however, we do agree with appellant that he was not given an opportunity to be heard, which requires reversal. Hipschman v. Cochran,683 So.2d 209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

¶5POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.