Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 425 So. 2d 1191 - Taylor v. State · Postma v. State · I.T. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Value may be established by direct testimony of fair market value or through evidence of the original market cost of the property, the manner in which the items were used, the condition and quality of the items, and the percentage of depreciation of the items since their purchase.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. D.D. v. State · Newland v. State“no evidence was offered as to the condition, quality, or age of the items at the time they were stolen or as to any depreciation in value since their purchase”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.