Larimore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 622 So. 2d 941 - Tripp v. State · 831 So. 2d 172 - State v. Atkinson · 839 So. 2d 715 - Gordon v. Regier · 880 So. 2d 533 - Tanguay v. State · Jimenez v. Crosby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the Act as amended clearly contemplates that a commitment petition should be filed before a person is released from total confinement, there is nothing in the Act that provides that the petition must be filed before the person’s release. Rather, the Act clearly states that its time limitations are not jurisdictional and do not prevent the state from proceeding pursuant to the Act even if the person is released from custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Larimore v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.