917 So. 2d 404 - Maxwell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Oregon v. Mathiason · Stansbury v. California · Dickerson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“he had the right to have the attorney present during questioning and that one would be appointed in the event he could not afford to hire one.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We do not believe that even the most erudite or mature individual could reasonably discern with the level of understanding required by Miranda that the warning given to Jonathanthat he "had the right to an attorney"encompasses the right to have an attorney present during questioning and the right to have one appointed in the event the individual could not afford to hire one. Failure to provide these warnings to Jonathan renders the statements he made inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“he had a right to have an attorney present during questioning and that an attorney would be appointed to represent him if he could not afford one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.