Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 918 F.2d 1188 - Angela v. Pasadena Independent School District

Angela v. Pasadena Independent School District’s Empirical Analysis

918 F.2d 1188 · 1990

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 13 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Wb Ej Ej v. Matula, A.W. v. Jersey City Public Schools (2007)

20 federal appellate · 13 district · 2 state decisions

390199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1412 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Bell v. Hood · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School District · Maher v. Gagne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any significant issue in litigation which achieves some of the benefit the parties sought in bringing suit.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “permit parents to obtain relief which otherwise is unavailable from the EHA”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the amendment has the same meaning as similar terms in other legislation. See Angela L. v. Pasadena Independent School Dist., 918 F.2d 1188 , 1193 (5th Cir.1990) (citing H.R.Rep. No. 296, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess. 5-6 (1985); S.Rep. No. 112, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess. 13-14 (1985); U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1986, p. 1798). See also Eggers v. Bullitt County School Dist., 854 F.2d 892 , 894-96 (6th Cir.1988). By analogy, under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, a prevailing party is one who”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.