United States v. Temple’s Empirical Analysis
918 F.2d 134 · 1990
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3585 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1325 (§ 275 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Frates v. Weinshienk · United States v. Woods · Ramsey v. Brennan · United States v. Baez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Congress did not intend criminal defendants to receive credit toward probation for time spent in custody”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The sentence of imprisonment of any person convicted of an offense shall commence to run from the date on which such person is received at the penitentiary, reformatory, or jail for service of such sentence. The Attorney General shall give any such person credit toward service of his sentence for any days spent in custody in connection with the offense or acts for which sentence was imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“constitute[ ] a sentence of imprisonment pursuant to section 3568.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.