918 F.2d 173 - Johnson v. V Bair Johnson

Johnson v. V Bair Johnson

Full caption · 6 consolidated cases

Larry Ray JOHNSONv.Toni V. BAIR, Regional Administrator
Larry Ray JOHNSONv.GADDY, C/O Sergeant Henderson, Rollette, C/), Captain Barksdale
Larry Ray JOHNSONv.Edward W. MURRAY, Sergeant Kyle, David Williams, Barry Marano, Sergeant Johnson, Captain Barksdale
Larry Ray JOHNSONv.Nurse THOMPSON
Larry Ray JOHNSONv.Edward MURRAY, David Williams, Doctor Barnes, Nurse Terrell, M.E. Riddle, D. Jefferson
Larry Ray JOHNSONv.Robert ASBURY, Barry Steve Mariano, David Williams, R.A. Lipsner, Layton Laster, Joe Edmond, Mr. Saunders, Mr. Gorge, A. Johnson, Mrs. Riddle, Toni V. Bair, D. Jefferson, E. Braksdale, Sergeant Evanchyk, Ms. Hembrick, R. Kaleski, Davis Pierson, Sergeant Cassell, Doctor Barnes, T.R. Israel, Assistant Warden Jarvis, Counselor Ocheltree, Ms. Staton, Warden Thompson, Thomas Bullock, Sgt. Moore, Ms. Connors, Bessie Parrious, Ms. Day, B. Roger, J. Boswell, Gaddy, Correctional Officer

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990. Decided Nov. 19, 1990.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-90-1094-AM, CA-90-839-AM, CA-90-1095-AM, CA-90-1093-AM, CA-90-1165-AM, CA-90-1166-AM)

Larry Ray Johnson, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Larry Ray Johnson appeals from the district court's orders denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his five separate civil complaints. See Graham v. Riddle, 554 F.2d 133 (4th Cir.1977). Our review of the records and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss these appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Bair, CA-90-1094-AM; Johnson v. Gaddy, CA-90-839-AM; Johnson v. Murray, CA-90-1095-AM; Johnson v. Nurse Thompson, CA-90-1093-AM; Johnson v. Murray, CA-90-1165-AM; Johnson v. Asbury, CA-90-1166-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 14, 1990; Aug. 28, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

DISMISSED.