Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

918 F.2d 174

Docket No. 90-7101.

Witherspoon v. Doe

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990. Decided Nov. 14, 1990.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-11-14

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 1990 · most notably United States v. Benjamin C. Horne (1990), Eva Shepard v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor (1990)

42 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-11-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., District Judge. (CA-90-29-B)

Otis Donald Witherspoon, appellant pro se.

Roann Nichols, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Otis Donald Witherspoon appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Witherspoon v. Doe, CA-90-29-B (D.Md. June 18, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/918/f2d/174 · .json · Public domain