Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 918 F.2d 280 - United States v. Devin

United States v. Devin’s Empirical Analysis

918 F.2d 280 · 1990

Citation profile

151
cited by 151 later decisions
3
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

105 federal appellate · 12 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 151 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Sepulveda (1993), United States v. Saccoccia (1995)

105 federal appellate · 12 district · 3 state decisions

7601990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1963 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Irvin v. Dowd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant who claims that his hand was prematurely forced by delayed disclosure cannot rely on wholly conclusory assertions but must bear the burden of producing, at the very least, a prima facie showing of a plausible strategic option which the delay foreclosed.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “prevented [the defense] from using the disclosed material effectively in preparing and presenting the defendant's case.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a more effective strategy would likely have resulted”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.