United States v. Dailey’s Empirical Analysis
918 F.2d 747 · 1990
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably United States v. Poulack (2001), United States v. Gonzalez-Acosta (1993)
20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Nunley · United States v. Russell · United States v. Peters · United States v. Cohoon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A stipulation made for trial purposes is no less binding at sentencing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“rely upon stipulations between the government and the defendant in determining the facts relevant to sentencing”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.