Miller v. Sunapee Difference, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
918 F.3d 172 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Thompson v. Forest · Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Brown Co. · Barnes v. New Hampshire Karting Ass'n · Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum · Pierce v. Cotuit Fire District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Summary judgment is appropriate when 'there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we must 'constru[e] the record in the light most favorable to the non- moving party and resolv[e] all reasonable inferences in that party's favor.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.