Bekele v. Lyft, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
918 F.3d 181 · 2019
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph · Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto · At&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion · AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion · At&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“appeal arises from an order on a motion to compel arbitration in connection with a motion to dismiss, . . . we draw the relevant facts from 'the complaint and the parties' submissions to the district court' on the motion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“both substantive unconscionability (that the terms are oppressive to one party) and procedural unconscionability (that the circumstances surrounding the formation of the contract show that the aggrieved party had no meaningful choice and was subject to unfair surprise).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an arbitration-fee-splitting arrangement is not substantively unconscionable when the arbitration fees a plaintiff would owe amount to less than the damages the plaintiff claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.