U.S. v. Ackies’s Empirical Analysis
918 F.3d 190 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2701 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3117 (§ 108 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3153 (§ 201 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Leon · Lamie v. United States Trustee · United States v. Vonn · Pegram v. Herdrich · Maryland v. Pringle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the denial of a suppression motion, we assess the district court's factfinding for clear error, and review legal questions (such as probable cause . . . ) de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.