U.S. v. Rodríguez-Rivera’s Empirical Analysis
918 F.3d 32 · 2019
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028A · 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Innamorati · Schatz v. Republican State Leadership Committee · United States v. DeLaurentis · United States v. Savarese · United States v. Guerrier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“apprise[s] the defendant of the charged offense so that the defendant can prepare a defense and plead double 1 They also argued that Puerto Rico was not a state for purposes of the Sherman Act, but the district court roundly rejected that argument, and it is not raised on appeal. - 6 - jeopardy in any future prosecution for the same offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.