Singh v. Cigna Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
918 F.3d 57 · 2019
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd. · Norton v. Sam's Club · ECA & Local 134 Ibew Joint Pension Trust v. Jp Morgan Chase Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“expect[s] to continue to allocate significant resources”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“significantly alter[ing] the total mix of information made available”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[I]t's so important for every employee ... to handle, maintain, and report on [Cigna's financial] information in compliance with all laws and regulations;' " and (ii) " '[W]e have a responsibility to act with integrity in all we do, including any and all dealings with government officials.' " Id. (quoting pamphlet) (brackets omitted). Cigna moved to dismiss the complaint, the district court granted that motion, and the plaintiffs appealed. The Second Circuit affirmed. It concluded that Cigna's purported fraudulent statements were immaterial, because a "reasonable investor would not 'consider [these statements] important in deciding whether to buy or sell shares of stock.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.