U.S. v. Read’s Empirical Analysis
918 F.3d 712 · 2019
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 4241 · 18 U.S.C. § 4242 · 18 U.S.C. § 7
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Faretta v. California · Jones v. Barnes · United States v. Gaudin · Indiana v. Edwards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“are not strategic choices about how best to achieve a client’s objectives; they are choices about what the client’s objectives in fact are.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kellogg-Roe v. Gerry“plead guilty, waive a jury, testify in his or her own behalf, or take an appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kellogg-Roe v. Gerry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.