Johnson v. Carpenter’s Empirical Analysis
918 F.3d 895 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Slack v. McDaniel · Lockett v. Ohio · Richardson v. Marsh · Boyde v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[B]ecause we conclude that trial counsel was not deficient ... [Petitioner's] auxiliary claim cannot succeed. Appellate counsel cannot be ineffective for omitting an unsuccessful issue on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Sharp“determine whether reasonable jurists could agree with the OCCA that [Smith's] trial and appellate counsels acted reasonably.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Sharp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.