Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

918 P.2d 740

Sparlin v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 2, 1996

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1996-07-02

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2007

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-07-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SIMMS, Justice,

¶1concurring specially:

¶2I agree with the majority’s conclusion that this appeal is untimely and should be dismissed, but I find it unnecessary to speculate about the efficacy of the motion for rehearing and the validity of the Commission’s ensuing modification of its previous order. Even if the order of December 22, 1995, effected a valid modification of the first order, this appeal, filed on February 14,1996, was untimely and the matter should simply be dismissed by order.

¶3I am authorized to state that Justice Watt joins with me in the views expressed herein.

/918/p2d/740 · .json · Public domain