Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

918 So. 2d 316

Docket No. 2D04-5295.

Okoh v. Okoh

Lisa M. OKOH, Appellant, v. James I. OKOH, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 12, 2005.

Rehearing Denied January 25, 2006.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-10-12

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2008

1 state decisions

Relies on 440 So. 2d 494 - Maas v. Maas · Hjortaas v. McCabe

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-10-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Lisa M. Okoh, pro se.

¶2Lorena L. Kiely of Law Office of Lorena L. Kiely, Tampa (withdrew after initial briefing), for Appellant.

¶3Caroline K. Black, Tampa, and Ingrid Anderson, Clearwater, for Appellee.

¶4SALCINES, Judge.

¶5In this difficult case, we are bound by the standard of review, which is whether the trial court's decision to set aside or uphold a marital settlement agreement was supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Hjortaas v. McCabe,656 So.2d 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Maas v. Maas,440 So.2d 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). We cannot reweigh the evidence, and the record does not reflect that the trial court committed reversible error. Accordingly, the trial court's order on the enforceability of the written marital settlement agreement is affirmed.

¶6Affirmed.

¶7WHATLEY and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

/918/so2d/316 · .json · Public domain