Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 918 SO2D 412 - Cunningham v. Cunningham

Cunningham v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 594 So. 2d 809 - Lanier v. Lanier · 588 So. 2d 1049 - Nelson v. Nelson · 652 So. 2d 1164 - Leon v. Leon · Baas v. Baas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is not the job of the state court in a dissolution proceeding to fashion remedies to enforce federal tax laws when the parties submit joint federal tax returns containing misstatements. Even when the parties misrepresent their income, the court must still attempt to establish alimony based on need, ability to pay, and the relevant statutory factors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.