Joseph v. Entergy’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on City of Kenner v. Jumonville · State ex rel. R.J.S. · HCNO SERVICES v. Secure Computing Systems · Reeves v. Thompson · 636 So. 2d 287 - Estate of Graham v. Levy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is clear that this was a civil contempt proceeding because the object was to force the appellants' compliance with, the court order and put a stop to [Mr.] Seeber's conduct in contacting representatives of Entergy in violation of the protective order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Joseph v. ENTERGY“we can find no authority for allowing a court to order payment of attorney fees in lieu of a contempt fine. As it is unclear from the record before this Court as to the intent of the trial court, we remand the matter for clarification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Joseph v. ENTERGY“neither TriStem, Ltd. nor Joe Seeber shall have any contact with Entergy or its representatives other than its counsel of record in this action, outside of a formal setting such as a deposition or judicial forum.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Joseph v. ENTERGY
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.