Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

918 S.W.2d 282

Holmes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1996

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1996-02-27

Decided 1996-02-27

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/918/sw2d/282 · .json · Public domain