Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

918 S.W.2d 283

Nauman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1996

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1996-02-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2011

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-02-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/918/sw2d/283 · .json · Public domain